Outcomes in the management of appendicitis and cholecystitis in the setting of a new acute care surgery service model: impact on timing and cost.

BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery model is a novel notion in the provision of emergency general surgery. To date, several studies have analyzed the effects on patient health outcomes and timeliness of care for nontrauma patients within the scope of acute general surgery and emergencies, but none have assessed the cost benefits of this model. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing appendectomy or cholecystectomy in the setting of acute abdomen was performed to compare data from 2 cohorts, the traditional model from July 2009 to June 2010 and the acute care surgery model from July 2010 to June 2011. Categorical variables and comparison means were examined using chi-square and independent 2-tailed sample t-tests. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five patients underwent appendectomy and 113 underwent cholecystectomy. The traditional model team staffed 82 appendectomies and 51 cholecystectomies, and the acute care surgery team staffed 93 and 62, respectively. In the appendectomy group, there was a statistically significant mean reduction of time to surgical evaluation (2.19 hours; p < 0.001) and time to the operating room (5.38 hours, p = 0.006), there were 7 fewer patients with complications (p = 0.06) and a reduced length of stay (1 day, p = 0.002) for the acute care surgery cohort. Similar statistically significant differences were observed in the cholecystectomy group in the acute care surgery cohort: surgical evaluation difference = 5.84 hours (p = 0.03), time to operating room difference = 25.37 hours (p = 0.002), 8 fewer patients with complications (p = 0.01), and length of stay difference was 2 days (p = 0.03) compared with the traditional model cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The newly implemented acute care surgery model in our institution accomplished earlier treatment and shorter length of stay for the 2 most common causes of acute abdomen in our setting. Overall, the new model translated to better outcomes for patients and savings per case for the hospital.

Tumor size and presence of calcifications on ultrasonography are pre-operative predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with papillary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are common and their presence can significantly alter the treatment for patients with PTC. We therefore sought to identify pre-operative predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with PTC. METHODS: A thyroid tumor database was queried to identify patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of PTC and underwent thyroidectomy between January 2006 and August 2009. One hundred and three patients who had a pre-operative ultrasound and had lymph nodes surgically resected were identified. Clinical factors and tumor ultrasound characteristics were recorded. The pre-operative ultrasound results, type of operation, and final pathology results were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients, 74 (72%) were women and 29 (28%) were men with an age range of 15-78 years (median age of 43). Of the ultrasound characteristics evaluated only calcifications (P = 0.007) and size (P = 0.003) were statistically associated with positive cervical lymph nodes. None of the other demographic or clinical factors were significantly associated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid nodule size and presence of calcifications on ultrasound were found to have a statistically significant association with lymph node metastases in patients with PTC. This information could be used to guide the surgical management of these patients.

A prospective analysis of critical limb ischemia: factors leading to major primary amputation versus revascularization.

In our aging population, primary major amputations (AMP, below-knee or above-knee) continue to be performed despite advances in revascularization. We hypothesized that not only patient comorbidities but also the system of health-care delivery affected the treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). A prospective analysis of patients presenting with CLI was undertaken to determine whether patient-specific factors or healthcare delivery factors (system-related) influenced treatment with primary AMP versus lower extremity revascularization (LER). The patient-specific factors age, gender, race/ethnicity, presence of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus (DM), dialysis dependence (end-stage renal disease, ESRD), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stage of CLI (rest pain, minor or major tissue loss), history of revascularization, and functional status (living situation and ambulatory status) were recorded. The system-related factors time from onset of CLI to vascular surgery evaluation and type of insurance (managed care/other insurance) were also noted. The influence of patient-specific and system-related factors on the primary treatment modality (AMP versus LER) was determined with univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 224 patients presented with CLI between March 1, 2001, and March 1, 2005. Patients were treated with primary major AMP in 97 cases (43%) and revascularization in 127 cases (57%). On univariate analysis, nonwhite race/ethnicity, DM, ESRD, major tissue loss, dependent living situation, and nonambulatory status were all significant predictors of AMP versus LER (all P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, major tissue loss, ESRD, DM, and nonambulatory status remained independent predictors of AMP versus LER (all P < 0.05). The system-related factors of time to vascular surgery evaluation (mean 8.6 weeks, 7.1 vs. 9.3 weeks AMP versus LER, P = 0.60) and type of insurance (managed care, 17% vs. 24% AMP vs. LER, P = 0.15) had no influence on treatment. Fifty-four percent of all primary major AMPs were performed due to extensive gangrene or infection present at initial vascular evaluation which precluded limb salvage. Major tissue loss, ESRD, DM, and nonambulatory status are all independent predictors of treatment with primary AMP as opposed to revascularization. Treatment of CLI is determined by patient-specific factors and does not appear to be adversely influenced by system-related factors. Efforts toward improving limb salvage may be best directed at aggressive treatment of medical comorbidities to prevent the late complications of CLI. Earlier recognition of tissue loss and referral to the vascular specialist may lead to improved limb salvage.